I am sure the cards that actually are 75W will lose more to RX 570, guesstimate would be 15-20%. GTX 1650 will be a strong player in laptops as well. Low-profile cards are bound to follow and while small it is a curious niche. Not to mention OEMs who love the same thing for mostly the same reasons. Trying to get office machines, especially brand machines with weak or proprietary PSUs to get basic gaming worthy does bring in a lot of sales. 75W TDP with the implication that it can work on PCI-e slot power and has no need for 6-pin power cable is an important optimization point and indeed a feature for sales. While almost all of us in the forums consider performance per $/€/£ the most important metric it is not the only one and not primary for everyone. GTX 950 was different - the primary TDP is 90W with 75W LP as secondary option. All do have more hungry variants but this is where the primary one is located at. In case of GTX 750Ti, GTX 1050Ti and GTX 1650, it is 75W.
The difference is in where the primary TDP is placed. Looks like GTX 750Ti's real successor was GTX 1050Ti and now GTX 1650. GTX 950 was not really the GTX 750Ti lineage with the primary TDP being set to 90W and some LP variants at 75W.
Click to expand.I would say the opposite.
0 kommentar(er)
